Announcing consumer software that doesn’t require a subscription shouldn’t be treated as an innovation.
This is how it’s supposed to work.
Source: Office LTSC 2024 is now available – Microsoft Community Hub
Announcing consumer software that doesn’t require a subscription shouldn’t be treated as an innovation.
This is how it’s supposed to work.
Source: Office LTSC 2024 is now available – Microsoft Community Hub
In a recent MIT experiment, three student teams were asked to write software code in Fortran, a programming language none of them knew. The results were pretty interesting:
The team using ChatGPT finished the fastest
The team using a specific AI coding assistant (Code Llama) came in second
The team using just Google search finished last, breaking down the task into comp`onents and solving it the old-fashioned way.
However, when tested on their ability to recall the solutions from memory, the situation was reversed. The ChatGPT team remembered nothing and failed, while half of the Code Llama team passed, and every student in the Google Search team succeeded.
The conclusion from this experiment is simple: there is no substitute for hard work Don’t just rely on AI tools; learn to code, crash, debug, and repeat.
I believe there are several vulnerabilities in our election process and there are several obvious solutions. Unfortunately, neither party is interested in fixing the obvious issues, making it patently obvious (to me) that the system is designed to be gamed and both sides are gaming it.
I don’t believe this is a partisan issue.
Here are some ideas for fixing the obvious vulnerabilities in our voting system:
These are some very simple steps to take and would remove much of the fraud that, in my opinion, continues to happen in each election. Of course none of these things will happen and we will continue to limp along with the existing system we have in place.
Resources
James Chapter 2
Group Discussion:
Notes from the Video: James for Men Bible Study Guide
Notes from the Revival School video on James 2: